Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

2 Courses

1 Subject

Module 6 Group Discussion

Module 6 Group Discussion

Q Goal and Purpose • To identify the features that paleoanthropologists expect to see in a member of genus Homo. • To compare and contrast the linear model of human evolution to the braided delta model. • Determine which model you find to be the most helpful analogy to understand the process of human evolution. Watch the last hour of PBS - The Dawn of Humanity (start at 1:00:00 and watch to the end of the film) Prompts If you are the first person to post in your group, then you should start the discussion using my prompts below: Please re-state the "hook question" from your peer at the beginning of your post and/or the prompt(s) that you are responding to at the beginning of your post. Prompt # 1 Based upon the information provided in this week's module (lecture, reading and film clips) describe why Homo naledi is considered to be part of genus Homo instead of an Australopithecine. Explain why John Hawks and Lee Berger believe that the Rising Star chamber may be an example of an intentional burial site. Prompt # 2 Describe the braided delta analogy. Do you think that this is a better way to describe the process of human evolution (in comparison to the linear model or tree analogy. Initial Post You will complete this discussion in a "hook format." This means that you only need to post one time and you need to reply to the student who posted before you. Please end your response with a question that the next student can hook on to. Please re-state the "hook question" from your peer at the beginning of your post and/or the prompt(s) that you are responding to at the beginning of your post. You are welcome to take any stance that you would like in this discussion - all you have to do is be able to back up your argument. It's okay if the conversation naturally moves away from the initial discussion. As long as the subject matter remains anthropological, you can take the conversation wherever you would like it to go. Please directly cite lectures, textbook, article and approved film clips (those found in the direction and/or that week's module) in your response in order to support your argument. Remember to think critically! Examine the the evidence presented, consider the speaker, consider the arguments coming from your professor and classmates and, ultimately, decide for yourself! • Please make sure that your responses are organized into complete sentences. I recommend that you devote at least one full paragraph to answering each discussion prompt. • Your final post should be at least 300 words. • You should exercise college-level writing skills with correct spelling, grammar and punctuation. • You should include reference to at least three academic resources throughout your initial post. • I highly recommend that you first type out your response in a Microsoft Word document and run a spell and grammar check prior to submitting your final post. Reply Posts Once you have completed your post, you should respond to at least two other student's posts. You will receive 4 points for each quality response. Remember, please don't simply say "I agree" or "I disagree." Please provide thoughtful and detailed responses. Feel free to ask follow-up questions to your peers to keep the discussion flowing and allow you to learn from each other. You should also provide citations whenever referencing outside sources. Each peer response should be at least 100 words. Submission Instructions You are welcome to take any stance that you would like in this discussion - all you have to do is be able to back up your argument. It's okay if the conversation naturally moves away from the initial discussion. As long as the subject matter remains anthropological, you can take the conversation wherever you would like it to go. Please directly cite lectures, textbook, article and approved film clips (those found in the direction and/or that week's module) in your response in order to support your argument. Remember to think critically! Examine the the evidence presented, consider the speaker, consider the arguments coming from your professor and classmates and, ultimately, decide for yourself! Rubric This is a graded discussion worth 20 points. Review the discussion rubric by clicking on the Options icon (three vertical dots) located in the upper right of the discussion page. Then, click "Show Rubric" button. Review the assessment criteria and points for this discussion. Feedback Your discussion will be graded within one week of the due date. Please see the grading rubric and my comments in the gradebook in Canvas for my feedback on any necessary improvements for future discussions. Resources Academic Sources and Citations: Approved academic sources include: • Chapter 11 Links to an external site.from the Explorations textbook. • The Early Members of Genus Homo Audio & Visual lecture. • Academic Journal articles (found in the weekly module or in the LAVC library data bases) • Approved films and film clips (found in the weekly modules) Please note that Wikipedia and other internet sources are NOT approved academic sources. You should include properly formatted in text citations whenever referencing a source. The Owl Purdue site is a very useful site when learning to properly cite your sources. Here is the link to the Owl Purdue Website for APA format: (Links to an external site.) Examples of In-Text Citations: To cite a textbook, article or PowerPoint slide, please include the last name of the author or authors followed by the year of publication, for example, it would look something like this (Miller 2018) or (Smith and Taylor 2014). These are just examples. To cite a film or film clip, please include the last name of the director or directors followed by the year of publication. For example, it would look something like this (Stevens 2017) ***Please note, that the author or authors of the Explorations textbook are included at the beginning and end of each chapter. There will be a different author for each chapter, so please take note of this as you are taking notes on the assigned chapters each week**** Technical Support Need help using Canvas Discussions? If so, please review the following Canvas guide pages: • How do I view Discussions as a student?Links to an external site. • How do I view the rubric for my graded discussion?Links to an external site. • How do I reply to a discussion as a student?Links to an external site. • Canvas Student Guide Discussions Additional SupportLinks to an external site.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

Homo sapiens "have an average brain size, slightly smaller teeth in the back than in the front of the mouth, emerging foreheads, wide nasal aperture, midfacial prognathism, no chin, and projecting occipital region" (Shook et al. 2019). Seen across Asia and Africa, Homo sapiens were found in many regions. Archaic Homo sapiens are different from Homo erectus in physical characteristics because they "trended toward less angular and higher skulls, had smaller brow ridges and a less-projecting face, had a wider nasal aperture, as well as a forward-projecting midfacial region" (Shook et al. 2019).